The set of circumstances where the writeback register is allowed to be in the
list of registers is rather baroque, but I think this implements them all on
the assembly parsing side.
For disassembly, we still warn about an ARM-mode LDM even if the architecture
revision is < v7 (the required architecture information isn't available). It's
a silly instruction anyway, so hopefully no-one will mind.
rdar://problem/15223374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193185 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
class. The instruction class includes the signed saturating doubling
multiply-add long, signed saturating doubling multiply-subtract long, and
the signed saturating doubling multiply long instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192908 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are no corresponding patterns for small immediates because they would
prevent the use of fused compare-and-branch instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191775 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Originally committed as r191661, but reverted because it changed the matching
order of comparisons on some hosts. That should have been fixed by r191735.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191738 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason, adding definitions for these load and store
instructions changed whether some of the build bots matched
comparisons as signed or unsigned.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191663 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add VEX_LIG to scalar FMA4 instructions.
Use VEX_LIG in some of the inheriting checks in disassembler table generator.
Make use of VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD contexts.
Don't let VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE inherit from their non-L forms unless VEX_LIG is set.
Let VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE inherit from all of their non-L or non-W cases.
Increase ranking on VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE so they get chosen over non-L/non-W forms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190930 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we modelled VPR128 and VPR64 as essentially identical
register-classes containing V0-V31 (which had Q0-Q31 as "sub_alias"
sub-registers). This model is starting to cause significant problems
for code generation, particularly writing EXTRACT/INSERT_SUBREG
patterns for converting between the two.
The change here switches to classifying VPR64 & VPR128 as
RegisterOperands, which are essentially aliases for RegisterClasses
with different parsing and printing behaviour. This fits almost
exactly with their real status (VPR128 == FPR128 printed strangely,
VPR64 == FPR64 printed strangely).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190665 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add basic assembly/disassembly support for the first Intel SHA
instruction 'sha1rnds4'. Also includes feature flag, and test cases.
Support for the remaining instructions will follow in a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
