This fixes an ABI bug for non-Darwin PPC64. For the callee-saved condition
registers, the spill location is specified relative to the stack pointer (SP +
8). However, this is not relative to the SP after the new stack frame is
established, but instead relative to the caller's stack pointer (it is stored
into the linkage area of the parent's stack frame).
So, like with the link register, we don't directly spill the CRs with other
callee-saved registers, but just mark them to be spilled during prologue
generation.
In practice, this reverts r179457 for PPC64 (but leaves it in place for PPC32).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179500 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One performs: (X == 13 | X == 14) -> X-13 <u 2
The other: (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1
The problem is that there are certain values of C1 and C2 that
trigger both transforms but the first one blocks out the second,
this generates suboptimal code.
Reordering the transforms should be better in every case and
allows us to do interesting stuff like turn:
%shr = lshr i32 %X, 4
%and = and i32 %shr, 15
%add = add i32 %and, -14
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %add, 0
into:
%and = and i32 %X, 240
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %and, 224
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the default model for non-PIC 64-bit code. It supports
text+data+bss linked anywhere in the low 16 TB of the address space.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179473 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
64-bit code models need multiple relocations that can't be inferred from
the opcode like they can in 32-bit code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179472 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SDNodes and MachineOperands get target flags representing the %hi() and
%lo() assembly annotations that eventually become relocations.
Also define flags to be used by the 64-bit code models.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Leaving MFCR has having unmodeled side effects is not enough to prevent
unwanted instruction reordering post-RA. We could probably apply a stronger
barrier attribute, but there is a better way: Add all (not just the first) CR
to be spilled as live-in to the entry block, and add all CRs to the MFCR
instruction as implicitly killed.
Unfortunately, I don't have a small test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179465 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, only abs32 and pic32 are implemented. Add a test case for
abs32 with 64-bit code. 64-bit PIC code is currently broken.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179463 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is basically the same fix in three different places. We use a set to avoid
walking the whole tree of a big ConstantExprs multiple times.
For example: (select cmp, (add big_expr 1), (add big_expr 2))
We don't want to visit big_expr twice here, it may consist of thousands of
nodes.
The testcase exercises this by creating an insanely large ConstantExprs out of
a loop. It's questionable if the optimizer should ever create those, but this
can be triggered with real C code. Fixes PR15714.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For functions that need to spill CRs, and have dynamic stack allocations, the
value of the SP during the restore is not what it was during the save, and so
we need to use the FP in these cases (as for all of the other spills and
restores, but the CR restore has a special code path because its reserved slot,
like the link register, is specified directly relative to the adjusted SP).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179457 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The initial values were arbitrary. I want them to be more
conservative. This represents the number of latency cycles hidden by
OOO execution. In practice, I think it should be within a small factor
of the complex floating point operation latency so the scheduler can
make some attempt to hide latency even for smallish blocks.
These are by no means the best values, just a starting point for
tuning heuristics. Some benchmarks such as TSVC run faster with this
lower value for SandyBridge. I haven't run anything on Haswell, but
it's shouldn't be 2x SB.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179450 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The register allocator expects minimal physreg live ranges. Schedule
physreg copies accordingly. This is slightly tricky when they occur in
the middle of the scheduling region. For now, this is handled by
rescheduling the copy when its associated instruction is
scheduled. Eventually we may instead bundle them, but only if we can
preserve the bundles as parallel copies during regalloc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179449 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I need to handle this for the test case in my following scheduler
commit.
Work is already under way to redesign the mechanism for node order
propagation because this case by case approach is unmaintainable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179448 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We are now able to handle big endian macho files in llvm-readobject. Thanks to
David Fang for providing the object files.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179440 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
