This makes the first stage DAG for @llvm.convert.to.fp16 an fptrunc,
and correspondingly @llvm.convert.from.fp16 an fpext. The legalisation
path is now uniform, regardless of the input IR:
fptrunc -> FP_TO_FP16 (if f16 illegal) -> libcall
fpext -> FP16_TO_FP (if f16 illegal) -> libcall
Each target should be able to select the version that best matches its
operations and not be required to duplicate patterns for both fptrunc
and FP_TO_FP16 (for example).
As a result we can remove some redundant AArch64 patterns.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Because i16 is illegal, there's no native DAG method to
represent a bitcast to or from an f16 type. This meant LLVM was
inserting a stack store/load pair which is really not ideal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213378 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Actual support for softening f16 operations is still limited, and can be added
when it's needed. But Soften is much closer to being a useful thing to try
than keeping it Legal when no registers can actually hold such values.
Longer term, we probably want something between Soften and Promote semantics
for most targets, it'll be more efficient to promote the 4 basic operations to
f32 than libcall them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This test is actually going in the opposite direction to what the
filename and function name suggested.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213358 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unfortunately, we don't seem to have a direct truncation, but the
extension can be legally split into two operations so we should
support that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213357 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang may well start emitting these soon, and while it may not be
directly relevant for OpenCL or GLSL, the instructions were just
sitting there waiting to be used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213356 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we asserted on this code. Currently compiler-rt doesn't
actually implement any of these new libcalls, but external help is
pretty much the only viable option for LLVM.
I've followed the much more generic "__truncST2" naming, as opposed to
the odd name for f32 -> f16 truncation. This can obviously be changed
later, or overridden by any targets that need to.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
x86 has no native ability to extend an f16 to f64, but the same result
is obtained if we expand it into two separate extensions: f16 -> f32
-> f64.
Unfortunately the same is not true for truncate, so that still results
in a compilation failure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes the two intrinsics @llvm.convert.from.f16 and
@llvm.convert.to.f16 accept types other than simple "float". This is
only strictly needed for the truncate operation, since otherwise
double rounding occurs and there's no way to represent the strict IEEE
conversion. However, for symmetry we allow larger types in the extend
too.
During legalization, we can expand an "fp16_to_double" operation into
two extends for convenience, but abort when the truncate isn't legal. A new
libcall is probably needed here.
Even after this commit, various target tweaks are needed to actually use the
extended intrinsics. I've put these into separate commits for clarity, so there
are no actual tests of f64 conversion here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It turns out that in most cases (the main exception being i1-related
types) once these operations are formed we cannot separate them and
the targets end up having to deal with them whether they want to or
not.
This is not a good situation, and a more reasonable default can be
formed by ackowledging this and having targets leave them as Legal.
Only x86 seems to be affected (other targets don't even try marking
the operation Expand).
Mostly there's no visible change here yet, but it will be useful to
have truly expanded EXTLOADS for MVT::f16 softening support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213162 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We construct a temporary "atomicrmw xchg" instruction when lowering atomic
stores for widths that aren't supported natively. This isn't on the top-level
worklist though, so it won't be removed automatically and we have to do it
ourselves once that itself has been lowered.
Thanks Saleem for pointing this out!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212948 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sufficiently twisted use of TableGen lets us write patterns directly for f16
(as an i16 promoted to i32) -> f32 conversion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212933 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is a good idea, it's slightly clearer and simpler. Unfortunately
the headline news is: we save one line!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We've been performing the wrong operation on ARM for "atomicrmw nand" for
years, since "a NAND b" is "~(a & b)" rather than ARM's very tempting "a & ~b".
This bled over into the generic expansion pass.
So I assume no-one has ever actually tried to do an atomic nand in the real
world. Oh well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212443 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The linker relies on relocation type info (e.g. is it a branch?) to perform the
correct actions, so we should keep that even when we end up using a scattered
relocation for whatever reason.
rdar://problem/17553104
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212333 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There were two issues here:
1. At the very least, scattered relocations cannot use the same code to
determine the corresponding symbol being referred to. For some reason we
pretend there is no symbol, even when one actually exists in the symtab, so to
match this behaviour getRelocationSymbol should simply return symbols_end for
scattered relocations.
2. Printing "-" when we can't get a symbol (including the scattered case, but
not exclusively), isn't that helpful. In both cases there *is* interesting
information in that field, so we should print it. As hex will do.
Small part of rdar://problem/17553104
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Otherwise they get freed and the implicit "isa<XYZ>" tests following
turn out badly (at least under sanitizers).
Also corrects the ordering of unordered atomic stores.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212136 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On targets without cmpxchg16b or cmpxchg8b, the borderline atomic
operations were slipping through the gaps.
X86AtomicExpand.cpp was delegating to ISelLowering. Generic
ISelLowering was delegating to X86ISelLowering and X86ISelLowering was
asserting. The correct behaviour is to expand to a libcall, preferably
in generic ISelLowering.
This can be achieved by X86ISelLowering deciding it doesn't want the
faff after all.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in
terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It
also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help
out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible
instructions..
rdar://problem/13496295
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Strictly, it's unpredictable. But we don't quite model that yet and an error is
better than ignoring the issue. This one somehow got left out before though.
rdar://problem/15997748
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211490 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It looks like there are two versions of LowerCallTo here: the
SelectionDAGBuilder one is designed to operate on LLVM IR, and the
TargetLowering one in the case where everything is at DAG level.
Previously, only the SelectionDAGBuilder variant could handle demoting
an impossible return to sret semantics (before delegating to the
TargetLowering version), but this functionality is also useful for
certain libcalls (e.g. 128-bit operations on 32-bit x86). So this
commit moves the sret handling down a level.
rdar://problem/17242889
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211155 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To make sure branches are in range, we need to do a better job of estimating
the length of an inline assembly block than "it's probably 1 instruction, who'd
write asm with more than that?".
Fortunately there's already a (highly suspect, see how many ways you can think
of to break it!) callback for this purpose, which is used by the other targets.
rdar://problem/17277590
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211095 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ARM v7M has ldrex/strex but not ldrexd/strexd. This means 32-bit
operations should work as normal, but 64-bit ones are almost certainly
doomed.
Patch by Phoebe Buckheister.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's valid to use FP_TO_SINT when asking for a smaller type (e.g. all
"unsigned int16" values fit into a "signed int32"), but the reverse
isn't true.
Unfortunately, I'm not actually aware of any architecture with
asymmetric FP_TO_SINT and FP_TO_UINT handling and the logic happens to
work in the symmetric case, so I can't actually write a test for this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210986 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There's probably no acatual change in behaviour here, just updating
the LowerFP_TO_INT function to be more similar to the reverse
implementation and updating costs to current CodeGen.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Lowering this new node allows us to fold the almost universal
comparison for success before it's even formed. Instead we can create
a copy from EFLAGS and an X86ISD::SETCC operation since all "cmpxchg"
instructions set the zero-flag to the correct value.
rdar://problem/13201607
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210923 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This also simplifies the IR we create slightly: instead of working out
where success & failure should go manually, it turns out we can just
always jump to a success/failure block created for the purpose. Later
phases will sort out the mess without much difficulty.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This has two benefits: it makes the result more suitable for direct
insertaion into the struct to emulate the new cmpxchg, and it means
the name we give the instruction matches its actual effect better.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It makes the types look like they're single-element structures. And
when we have instructions that *do* result in a struct, that can get
confusing rather quickly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210905 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit adds a weak variant of the cmpxchg operation, as described
in C++11. A cmpxchg instruction with this modifier is permitted to
fail to store, even if the comparison indicated it should.
As a result, cmpxchg instructions must return a flag indicating
success in addition to their original iN value loaded. Thus, for
uniformity *all* cmpxchg instructions now return "{ iN, i1 }". The
second flag is 1 when the store succeeded.
At the DAG level, a new ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS node has been
added as the natural representation for the new cmpxchg instructions.
It is a strong cmpxchg.
By default this gets Expanded to the existing ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP during
Legalization, so existing backends should see no change in behaviour.
If they wish to deal with the enhanced node instead, they can call
setOperationAction on it. Beware: as a node with 2 results, it cannot
be selected from TableGen.
Currently, no use is made of the extra information provided in this
patch. Test updates are almost entirely adapting the input IR to the
new scheme.
Summary for out of tree users:
------------------------------
+ Legacy Bitcode files are upgraded during read.
+ Legacy assembly IR files will be invalid.
+ Front-ends must adapt to different type for "cmpxchg".
+ Backends should be unaffected by default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210903 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As Ana Pazos pointed out, these have to be restored to their incoming values
before a function returns; i.e. before the tail call. So they can't be used
correctly as the destination register.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The C++ and C semantics of the compare_and_swap operations actually
require us to return a boolean "success" value. In LLVM terms this
means a second comparison of the output of "cmpxchg" against the input
desired value.
However, x86's "cmpxchg" instruction sets all flags for the comparison
formed, so we can skip any secondary comparison. (N.b. this isn't true
for cmpxchg8b/16b, which only set ZF).
rdar://problem/13201607
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210523 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we were abandonning the attempt, leading to some combination of
extra work (when selection of a load/store fails completely) and inferior code
(when this leads to a real memcpy call instead of inlining).
rdar://problem/17187463
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210520 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were hitting an assert if FastISel couldn't create the load or store we
requested. Currently this happens for large frame-local addresses, though
CodeGen could be improved there.
rdar://problem/17187463
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210519 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This means the output of LowerFormalArguments returns a lowered
SDValue with the correct type (expected in SelectionDAGBuilder).
Without this, an assertion under a DEBUG macro triggers when those
types are passed on the stack.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210102 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unordered is strictly weaker than monotonic, so if the latter doesn't have any
barriers then the former certainly shouldn't.
rdar://problem/16548260
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209901 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Darwin prologues save their GPRs in two stages: a narrow push of r0-r7 & lr,
followed by a wide push of the remaining registers if there are any. AAPCS uses
a single push.w instruction.
It turns out that, on average, enough registers get pushed that code is smaller
in the AAPCS prologue, which is a nice property for M-class programmers. They
also have other options available for back-traces, so can hopefully deal with
the fact that FP & LR aren't adjacent in memory.
rdar://problem/15909583
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209895 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes LLVM create N_INDR aliases (to be resolved by the linker) when
appropriate.
rdar://problem/15125513
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209894 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The C and C++ semantics for compare_exchange require it to return a bool
indicating success. This gets mapped to LLVM IR which follows each cmpxchg with
an icmp of the value loaded against the desired value.
When lowered to ldxr/stxr loops, this extra comparison is redundant: its
results are implicit in the control-flow of the function.
This commit makes two changes: it replaces that icmp with appropriate PHI
nodes, and then makes sure earlyCSE is called after expansion to actually make
use of the opportunities revealed.
I've also added -{arm,aarch64}-enable-atomic-tidy options, so that
existing fragile tests aren't perturbed too much by the change. Many
of them either rely on undef/unreachable too pervasively to be
restored to something well-defined (particularly while making sure
they test the same obscure assert from many years ago), or depend on a
particular CFG shape, which is disrupted by SimplifyCFG.
rdar://problem/16227836
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A test in test/Generic creates a DAG where the NZCV output of an ADCS is used
by multiple nodes. This makes LLVM want to save a copy of NZCV for later, which
it couldn't do before.
This should be the last fix required for the aarch64 buildbot.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Cortex-M4 only has single-precision floating point support, so any LLVM
"double" type will have been split into 2 i32s by now. Fortunately, the
consecutive-register framework turns out to be precisely what's needed to
reconstruct the double and follow AAPCS-VFP correctly!
rdar://problem/17012966
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209650 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are tested by test/CodeGen/Generic, so we should probably know
how to deal with them. Fortunately generic code does it if asked.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209646 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is debatable. There are two possible approaches, neither
of which is really satisfactory:
1. Use "@foo(i1 zeroext)" to mean an extension to 32-bits on Darwin,
and 8 bits otherwise.
2. Redefine "@foo(i1)" to mean that the i1 is extended by the caller
to 8 bits. This goes against the spirit of "zeroext" I think, but
it's a bit of a vague construct anyway (by definition you're going
to extend to the amount required by the ABI, that's why it's the
ABI!).
This implements option 2. The DAG machinery really isn't setup for the
first (there's a fairly strong assumption that "zeroext" goes to at
least the smallest register size), and even if it was the resulting
DAG looks like it would be inferior in many cases.
Theoretically we could add AssertZext nodes in the consumers of
ABI-passed values too now, but this actually seems to make the code
worse in practice by making truncation proceed in two steps. The code
produced is equally valid if we continue to assume only the low bit is
defined.
Should fix PR19850
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209637 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can eliminate the custom C++ code in favour of some TableGen to
check the same things. Functionality should be identical, except for a
buffer overrun that was present in the C++ code and meant webkit
failed if any small argument needed to be passed on the stack.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code emitted is what would be expected for the small model, so it
shouldn't be used when objects can be the full 64-bits away.
This fixes MCJIT tests on Linux.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209585 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit starts with a "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and continues out
from there, renaming the C++ classes, intrinsics, and other
target-local objects for consistency.
"ARM64" test directories are also moved, and tests that began their
life in ARM64 use an arm64 triple, those from AArch64 use an aarch64
triple. Both should be equivalent though.
This finishes the AArch64 merge, and everyone should feel free to
continue committing as normal now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209577 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm doing this in two phases for a better "git blame" record. This
commit removes the previous AArch64 backend and redirects all
functionality to ARM64. It also deduplicates test-lines and removes
orphaned AArch64 tests.
The next step will be "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and rewire most of the
tests.
Hopefully LLVM is still functional, though it would be even better if
no-one ever had to care because the rename happens straight
afterwards.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After the load/store refactoring, we were sometimes trying to feed a
GPR64 into a 32-bit register offset operand. This failed in
copyPhysReg.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We should be keeping track of the writeback on these instructions,
otherwise we're relying on LLVM's stupidity for correct code.
Fortunately, the MC layer can now handle all required constraints,
which means we can get rid of the CodeGen only PseudoInsts too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209426 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This changes ARM64 to use separate operands for each component of an
address, and look for separate '[', '$Rn, ..., ']' tokens when
parsing.
This allows us to do away with quite a bit of special C++ code to
handle monolithic "addressing modes" in the MC components. The more
incremental matching of the assembler operands also allows for better
diagnostics when LLVM is presented with invalid input.
Most of the complexity here is with the register-offset instructions,
which were extremely dodgy beforehand: even when the instruction used
wM, LLVM's model had xM as an operand. We papered over this
discrepancy before, but that approach doesn't work now so I split them
into separate X and W variants.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209425 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Should be no change in behaviour, but it makes the intended
functionality a bit clearer and means we only have to reason about
real extend operations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows the results of a ComplexPattern check to be distributed to separate
named Operands, instead of the current system where all results must apply (and
match perfectly) with a single Operand.
For example, if "some_addrmode" is a ComplexPattern producing two results, you
can write:
def : Pat<(load (some_addrmode GPR64:$base, imm:$offset)),
(INST GPR64:$base, imm:$offset)>;
This should allow neater instruction definitions in TableGen that don't put all
possible aspects of addressing into a single operand, but are still usable with
relatively simple C++ CodeGen idioms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209206 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When multiple aliases overlap, the correct string to print can often be
determined purely by considering the InstAlias declarations in some particular
order. This allows the user to specify that order manually when desired,
without resorting to hacking around with the default lexicographical order on
Record instantiation, which is error-prone and ugly.
I was also mistaken about "add w2, w3, w4" being the same as "add w2, w3, w4,
uxtw". That's only true if Rn is the stack pointer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
TableGen has a fairly dubious heuristic to decide whether an alias should be
printed: does the alias have lest operands than the real instruction. This is
bad enough (particularly with no way to override it), but it should at least be
calculated consistently for both strings.
This patch implements that logic: first get the *correct* string for the
variant, in the same way as the Matcher, without guessing; then count the
number of whitespace chars.
There are basically 4 changes this brings about after the previous
commits; all of these appear to be good, so I have changed the tests:
+ ARM64: we print "neg X, Y" instead of "sub X, xzr, Y".
+ ARM64: we skip implicit "uxtx" and "uxtw" modifiers.
+ Sparc: we print "mov A, B" instead of "or %g0, A, B".
+ Sparc: we print "fcmpX A, B" instead of "fcmpX %fcc0, A, B"
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208969 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The canonical syntax is "fcmXY ..., #0.0".
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208968 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This alias appears not to have an appropriate PrintMethod. Normally, I'd look
into it, but since AArch64 is disappearing soon it's probably not worth it.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208967 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These aliases are handled entirely in C++ and only having TableGen InstAliases
for some of them was confusing LLVM.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Certainly not without having a custom PrintMethod to invert the immediate
beforehand. But probably not at all.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In AT&T syntax, we should probably print the full "movl" or "movw". TableGen
used to ignore these aliases because it was miscounting the number of operands.
This fixes the issue.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias"
heuristic is fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208963 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Actually, MOV sometimes is canonical, but for now this is a better
approximation than what's there.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208962 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
You can perform (say) an fcmle operation by swapping the operands on an fcmge,
but it shouldn't be printed like that.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We accept "ldr w3, [x1, #-1]" as a convenience, but we should still print the
canonical "ldur" form.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If an ANDS instruction has Rd == ZR it should be printed as TST since
its only effect is on the flags register NZCV.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias"
heuristic is fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208959 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MOV is almost always the right thing to print if possile. People understand it.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208958 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For example, the full instruction "sub w0, wzr, w1, uxtw" could print as either
"neg w0, w1" or "sub w0, wzr, w1". The former is better.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208957 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
You can write "lslv w0, w1, w2" (probably for legacy reasons), but it should be
printed as simply "lsl".
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208956 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Tim Northover