We currently try to push an even number of registers to preserve 8-byte
alignment during a function's prologue, but only when the stack alignment is
prcisely 8. Many of the reasons for doing it apply also when that alignment > 8
(the extra store is often free, and can save another stack adjustment, though
less frequently for 16-byte stack alignment).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were making an attempt to do this by adding an extra callee-saved GPR (so
that there was an even number in the list), but when that failed we went ahead
and pushed anyway.
This had a couple of potential issues:
+ The .cfi directives we emit misplaced dN because they were based on
PrologEpilogInserter's calculation.
+ Unaligned stores can be less efficient.
+ Unaligned stores can actually fault (likely only an issue in niche cases,
but possible).
This adds a final explicit stack adjustment if all other options fail, so that
the actual locations of the registers match up with where they should be.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221320 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This CPU definition is redundant. The Cortex-A9 is defined as
supporting multiprocessing extensions. Remove its definition and
update appropriate tests.
LLVM defines both a cortex-a9 CPU and a cortex-a9-mp CPU. The only
difference between the two CPU definitions in ARM.td is that
cortex-a9-mp contains the feature FeatureMP for multiprocessing
extensions.
This is redundant since the Cortex-A9 is defined as having
multiprocessing extensions in the TRMs. armcc also defines the
Cortex-A9 as having multiprocessing extensions by default.
Change-Id: Ifcadaa6c322be0a33d9d2a39cfdd7da1d75981a7
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221166 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds an optimization in CodeGenPrepare to move an extractelement
right before a store when the target can combine them.
The optimization may promote any scalar operations to vector operations in the
way to make that possible.
** Context **
Some targets use different register files for both vector and scalar operations.
This means that transitioning from one domain to another may incur copy from one
register file to another. These copies are not coalescable and may be expensive.
For example, according to the scheduling model, on cortex-A8 a vector to GPR
move is 20 cycles.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(<2 x i32>* %addr1, i32* %dest) {
%in1 = load <2 x i32>* %addr1, align 8
%extract = extractelement <2 x i32> %in1, i32 1
%out = or i32 %extract, 1
store i32 %out, i32* %dest, align 4
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on armv7:
vldr d16, [r0] @vector load
vmov.32 r0, d16[1] @ cross-register-file copy: 20 cycles
orr r0, r0, #1 @ scalar bitwise or
str r0, [r1] @ scalar store
bx lr
Whereas we could generate much faster code:
vldr d16, [r0] @ vector load
vorr.i32 d16, #0x1 @ vector bitwise or
vst1.32 {d16[1]}, [r1:32] @ vector extract + store
bx lr
Half of the computation made in the vector is useless, but this allows to get
rid of the expensive cross-register-file copy.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid this cross-register-copy penalty, we promote the scalar operations to
vector operations. The penalty will be removed if we manage to promote the whole
chain of computation in the vector domain.
Currently, we do that only when the chain of computation ends by a store and the
target is able to combine an extract with a store.
Stores are the most likely candidates, because other instructions produce values
that would need to be promoted and so, extracted as some point[1]. Moreover,
this is customary that targets feature stores that perform a vector extract (see
AArch64 and X86 for instance).
The proposed implementation relies on the TargetTransformInfo to decide whether
or not it is beneficial to promote a chain of computation in the vector domain.
Unfortunately, this interface is rather inaccurate for this level of details and
although this optimization may be beneficial for X86 and AArch64, the inaccuracy
will lead to the optimization being too aggressive.
Basically in TargetTransformInfo, everything that is legal has a cost of 1,
whereas, even if a vector type is legal, usually a vector operation is slightly
more expensive than its scalar counterpart. That will lead to too many
promotions that may not be counter balanced by the saving of the
cross-register-file copy. For instance, on AArch64 this penalty is just 4
cycles.
For now, the optimization is just enabled for ARM prior than v8, since those
processors have a larger penalty on cross-register-file copies, and the scope is
limited to basic blocks. Because of these two factors, we limit the effects of
the inaccuracy. Indeed, I did not want to build up a fancy cost model with block
frequency and everything on top of that.
[1] We can imagine targets that can combine an extractelement with other
instructions than just stores. If we want to go into that direction, the current
interfaces must be augmented and, moreover, I think this becomes a global isel
problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5921
<rdar://problem/14170854>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220978 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It should be on for every target that supports unaligned accesses (e.g. not
v6m).
Patch by Charlie Turner.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220912 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, the ARM backend will select the VMAXNM and VMINNM for these C
expressions:
(a < b) ? a : b
(a > b) ? a : b
but not these expressions:
(a > b) ? b : a
(a < b) ? b : a
This patch allows all of these expressions to be matched.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This updates check for double precision zero floating point constant to allow
use of instruction with immediate value rather than temporary register.
Currently "a == 0.0", where "a" is of "double" type generates:
vmov.i32 d16, #0x0
vcmpe.f64 d0, d16
With this change it becomes:
vcmpe.f64 d0, #0
Patch by Sergey Dmitrouk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220486 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The previous code had a few problems, motivating the choices here.
1. It could create instructions clobbering CPSR, but the incoming MachineInstr
didn't reflect this. A potential source of corruption. This is why the patch
has a new PseudoInst for before lowering.
2. Similarly, there was some code to handle the incoming instruction not being
ARMCC::AL, but this would have caused massive problems if it was actually
invoked when a complex offset needing more than one instruction was requested.
3. It wasn't designed to handle unaligned pointers (or offsets). These should
probably be minimised anyway, but the code needs to deal with them properly
regardless.
4. It had some rather dubious ad-hoc code to avoid calling
emitThumbRegPlusImmediate, a function which should be designed to do precisely
this job.
We seem to cover the common cases correctly now, and hopefully can enhance
emitThumbRegPlusImmediate to handle any extra optimisations we need to add in
future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220236 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The current instruction selection patterns for SMULW[BT] and SMLAW[BT]
are incorrect. These instructions multiply a 32-bit and a 16-bit value
(both signed) and return the top 32 bits of the 48-bit result. This
preserves the 16 bits of overflow, whereas the patterns they currently
match truncate the result to 16 bits then sign extend.
To select these instructions, we would need to match an ISD::SMUL_LOHI,
a sign extend, two shifts and an or. There is no way to match SMUL_LOHI
in an instruction pattern as it defines multiple values, so this would
have to be done in C++. I have raised
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21297 to cover allowing correct
selection of these instructions.
This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19396
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Thumb1 has legitimate reasons for preferring 32-bit alignment of types
i1/i8/i16, since the 16-bit encoding of "add rD, sp, #imm" requires #imm to be
a multiple of 4. However, this is a trade-off betweem code size and RAM usage;
the DataLayout string is not the best place to represent it even if desired.
So this patch removes the extra Thumb requirements, hopefully making ARM and
Thumb completely compatible in this respect.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There's no hard requirement on LLVM to align local variable to 32-bits, so the
Thumb1 frame handling needs to be able to deal with variables that are only
naturally aligned without falling over.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before, ARM and Thumb mode code had different preferred alignments, which could
lead to some rather unexpected results. There's justification for reducing it
from the default 64-bits (wasted space), but I don't think there is for going
below 32-bits.
There's no actual ABI change here, just to reassure people.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).
Original commit message follows.
--
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
That commit was introduced in order to help investigate a problem in ARM
codegen breaking from commit 202304 (Add a limit to the heuristic that register
allocates instructions in local order). Recent analisys indicated that the
problem no longer exists, so I'm reverting this change.
See PR18996.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218981 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218914 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As with x86 and AArch64, certain situations can arise where we need to spill
CPSR in the middle of a calculation. These should be avoided where possible
(MRS/MSR is rather expensive), which ARM is actually better at than the other
two since it tries to Glue defs to uses, but as a last ditch effort, copying is
better than crashing.
rdar://problem/18011155
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218789 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, we only codegen the VRINT[APMXZR] and VCVT[BT] instructions
when targeting ARMv8, but they are actually present on any target with
FP-ARMv8. Note that FP-ARMv8 is called FPv5 when is is part of an
M-profile core, but they have the same instructions so we model them
both as FPARMv8 in the ARM backend.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Cortex-M7 has 3 options for its FPU: none, FPv5-SP-D16 and
FPv5-DP-D16. FPv5 has the same instructions as FP-ARMv8, so it can be
modelled using the same target feature, and all double-precision
operations are already disabled by the fp-only-sp target features.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This testcase was not testing what it meant: because there were only two checks for
dmb {{ish}} in the second function, it could have missed a bug where one of the three
required dmb {{ish}} became dmb {{ishst}}. As I was fixing it, I also added
CHECK-LABELs to make it a bit less brittle.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The fix is slightly different then x86 (see r216117) because the number of values
attached to a return can vary even for a single returned value (e.g., f64 yields
two returned values).
<rdar://problem/18352998>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218076 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch was originally in D5304 (I could not find a way to reopen that revision).
It was accepted, commited and broke the build bots because the overloading of
the constructor of ArrayRef for braced initializer lists is not supported by all
toolchains. I then reverted it, and propose this fixed version that uses a plain
C array instead in makeDMB (that array is then converted implicitly to an
ArrayRef, but that is not behind an ifdef). Could someone confirm me whether
initialization lists for plain C arrays are supported by every toolchain used
to build llvm ? Otherwise I can just initialize the array in the old way:
args[0] = ...; .. ; args[5] = ...;
Below is the description of the original patch:
```
I had only tested this code for ARMv7 and ARMv8. This patch adds several
fallback paths if the processor does not support dmb ish:
- dmb sy if a cortex-M with support for dmb
- mcr p15, #0, r0, c7, c10, #5 for ARMv6 (special instruction equivalent to a DMB)
These fallback paths were chosen based on the code for fence seq_cst.
Thanks to luqmana for having noticed this bug.
```
Test Plan: Added more cases to atomic-load-store.ll + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover, luqmana
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5386
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218066 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is breaking the build on the buildbots but works fine on my machine, I revert
while trying to understand what happens (it appears to depend on the compiler used
to build, I probably used a C++11 feature that is not perfectly supported by some
of the buildbots).
This reverts commit feb3176c4d006f99af8b40373abd56215a90e7cc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I had only tested this code for ARMv7 and ARMv8. This patch adds several
fallback paths if the processor does not support dmb ish:
- dmb sy if a cortex-M with support for dmb
- mcr p15, #0, r0, c7, c10, #5 for ARMv6 (special instruction equivalent to a DMB)
These fallback paths were chosen based on the code for fence seq_cst.
Thanks to luqmana for having noticed this bug.
Test Plan: Added more cases to atomic-load-store.ll + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover, luqmana
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5304
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217965 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The only Thumb-1 multi-store capable of using LR is the PUSH instruction, which
translates to STMDB, so we shouldn't convert STMIAs.
Patch by Sergey Dmitrouk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217498 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While working on a Thumb-2 code size optimization I just realized that we don't have any regression tests for it.
So here's a first test case, I plan to increase the coverage over time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r215862 due to nightly failures. Will work on getting a
reduced test case, but I wanted to get our bots green in the meantime.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There's no need to do this if the user doesn't call va_start. In the
future, we're going to have thunks that forward these register
parameters with musttail calls, and they won't need these spills for
handling va_start.
Most of the test suite changes are adding va_start calls to existing
tests to keep things working.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instruction from ARMInstrInfo to ARMBaseInstrInfo.
That way, thumb mode can also benefit from the advanced copy optimization.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216274 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
