Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238192 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The raw non-instruction/constant form of this is still relying on being
able to access the pointee type from a pointer type - those will be
cleaned up later. For now, just focus on the cases where the pointee
type is easily accessible.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237958 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This starts merging MCSection and MCSectionData.
There are a few issues with the current split between MCSection and
MCSectionData.
* It optimizes the the not as important case. We want the production
of .o files to be really fast, but the split puts the information used
for .o emission in a separate data structure.
* The ELF/COFF/MachO hierarchy is not represented in MCSectionData,
leading to some ad-hoc ways to represent the various flags.
* It makes it harder to remember where each item is.
The attached patch starts merging the two by moving the alignment from
MCSectionData to MCSection.
Most of the patch is actually just dropping 'const', since
MCSectionData is mutable, but MCSection was not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove most remaining calls to `MCSymbolData::getSymbol()`, instead
using the already available `MCSymbol` directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237829 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that Intrinsic::ID is a typed enum, we can forward declare it and so return it from this method.
This updates all users which were either using an unsigned to store it, or had a now unnecessary cast.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237810 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ld64 currently mishandles internal pointer relocations (i.e.
ARM64_RELOC_UNSIGNED referred to by section & offset rather than symbol). The
existing __cfstring clause was an early discovery and workaround for this, but
the problem is wider and we should avoid such relocations wherever possible for
now.
This code should be reverted to allowing internal relocations as soon as
possible.
PR23437.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237621 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was previously returning int. However there are no negative opcode
numbers and more importantly this was needlessly different from
MCInstrDesc::getOpcode() (which even is the value returned here) and
SDValue::getOpcode()/SDNode::getOpcode().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements LLVM support for the ACLE special register intrinsics in
section 10.1, __arm_{w,r}sr{,p,64}.
This patch is intended to lower the read/write_register instrinsics, used to
implement the special register intrinsics in the clang patch for special
register intrinsics (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D9697), to ARM specific
instructions MRC,MCR,MSR etc. to allow reading an writing of coprocessor
registers in AArch32 and AArch64. This is done by inspecting the register
string passed to the intrinsic and then lowering to the appropriate
instruction.
Patch by Luke Cheeseman.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9699
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237579 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Change `MCFragment::Atom` from an `MCSymbolData` to an `MCSymbol`,
moving in the direction of removing the back-pointer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237497 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The new [SU]{MIN,MAX} SDNodes can be lowered directly to instructions for
most NEON datatypes - the big exclusion being v2i64.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237455 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The buildbots are still not satisfied.
MIPS and ARM are failing (even though at least MIPS was expected to pass).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237245 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code that builds the dependence graph assumes that two PseudoSourceValues
don't alias. In a tail calling function two FixedStackObjects might refer to the
same location. Worse 'immutable' fixed stack objects like function arguments are
not immutable and will be clobbered.
Change this so that a load from a FixedStackObject is not invariant in a tail
calling function and don't return a PseudoSourceValue for an instruction in tail
calling functions when building the dependence graph so that we handle function
arguments conservatively.
Fix for PR23459.
rdar://20740035
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were accidentally folding a sign/zero extend in to address arithmetic in a different BB when the extend wasn't available there.
Cross BB fast-isel isn't safe, so restrict this to only when the extend is in the same BB as the use.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch disabled unrolling in loop vectorization pass when VF==1 on x86 architecture,
by setting MaxInterleaveFactor to 1. Unrolling in loop vectorization pass may introduce
the cost of overflow check, memory boundary check and extra prologue/epilogue code when
regular unroller will unroll the loop another time. Disable it when VF==1 remove the
unnecessary cost on x86. The same can be done for other platforms after verifying
interleaving/memory bound checking to be not perf critical on those platforms.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9515
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236613 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rafael Espindola
Chad Rosier
Diego Novillo
Luke Cheeseman
Michael Kuperstein
Benjamin Kramer
David Blaikie
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
Pete Cooper
Matthias Braun
Tim Northover
Jim Grosbach
Oliver Stannard
James Molloy
Artyom Skrobov
Vladimir Sukharev
Silviu Baranga
Arnold Schwaighofer
Wei Mi
Quentin Colombet