Specifically, objc-arc-expand will make sure that the
objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue, objc_autoreleaseReturnValue, and ret
will all have %call as an argument.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178382 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
std::lower_bound is the canonical "binary search" in the STL
(std::binary_search generally is not what you want). The name actually
makes a lot of sense (and also has a beautiful symmetry with the
std::upper_bound algorithm). The name is nonetheless non-obvious.
Also, remove mention of "radix search". It's not even clear how that
would work in the context of a sorted vector. AFAIK "radix search" only
makes sense when you have a trie-like data structure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178376 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
clang.arc.used is an interesting call for ARC since ObjCARCContract
needs to run to remove said intrinsic to avoid a linker error (since the
call does not exist).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178369 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
die values. A lot of DIEs have 10 attributes in C++ code (example
clang), none had more than 12. Seems like a good default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Like nearbyint, rint can be implemented on PPC using the frin instruction. The
complication comes from the fact that rint needs to set the FE_INEXACT flag
when the result does not equal the input value (and frin does not do that). As
a result, we use a custom inserter which, after the rounding, compares the
rounded value with the original, and if they differ, explicitly sets the XX bit
in the FPSCR register (which corresponds to FE_INEXACT).
Once LLVM has better modeling of the floating-point environment we should be
able to (often) eliminate this extra complexity.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A9 uses itinerary classes, Swift uses RW lists. This tripped some
verification when we're expanding variants. I had to refine the
verification a bit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178357 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These instructions are available on the P5x (and later) and on the A2. They
implement the standard floating-point rounding operations (floor, trunc, etc.).
One caveat: frin (round to nearest) does not implement "ties to even", and so
is only enabled in fast-math mode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178337 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 617330909f.
It broke the bots:
/home/clangbuild2/clang-ppc64-2/llvm.src/unittests/ADT/SmallVectorTest.cpp:150: PushPopTest
/home/clangbuild2/clang-ppc64-2/llvm.src/unittests/ADT/SmallVectorTest.cpp:118: Failure
Value of: v[i].getValue()
Actual: 0
Expected: value
Which is: 2
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178334 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Mips assembler supports macros that allows the OR instruction
to have an immediate parameter. This patch adds an instruction
alias that converts this macro into a Mips ORI instruction.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178316 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- RDRAND always clears the destination value when a random value is not
available (i.e. CF == 0). This value is truncated or zero-extended as
the false boolean value to be returned. Boolean simplification needs
to skip this 'zext' or 'trunc' node.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To enable a load of a call address to be folded with that call, this
load is moved from outside of callseq into callseq. Such a moving
adds a non-glued node (that load) into a glued sequence. This non-glue
load is only removed when DAG selection folds them into a memory form
call instruction. When such instruction selection is disabled, it breaks
DAG schedule.
To prevent that, such moving is disabled when target favors register
indirect call.
Previous workaround disabling CALL32m/CALL64m insn selection is removed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178308 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
immediate in a register. I don't believe this should ever fail, but I see no
harm in trying to make this code bullet proof.
I've added an assert to ensure my assumtion is correct. If the assertion fires
something is wrong and we should fix it, rather then just silently fall back to
SelectionDAG isel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178305 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Mips assembler allows following to be used as aliased instructions:
jal $rs for jalr $rs
jal $rd,$rd for jalr $rd,$rs
This patch provides alias definitions in td files and test cases to show the usage.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178304 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Compiling in 32-bit mode on a P7 would assert after 64-bit DAG combines were
added for bswap with load/store. This is because these combines are really only
valid in 64-bit mode, regardless of the CPU (and this was not being checked).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since we handle optimizable objc_retainBlocks through strength reduction
in OptimizableIndividualCalls, we know that all code after that point
will only see non-optimizable objc_retainBlock calls. IsForwarding is
only called by functions after that point, so it is ok to just classify
objc_retainBlock as non-forwarding.
<rdar://problem/13249661>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If an objc_retainBlock has the copy_on_escape metadata attached to it
AND if the block pointer argument only escapes down the stack, we are
allowed to strength reduce the objc_retainBlock to to an objc_retain and
thus optimize it.
Current there is logic in the ARC data flow analysis to handle
this case which is complicated and involved making distinctions in
between objc_retainBlock and objc_retain in certain places and
considering them the same in others.
This patch simplifies said code by:
1. Performing the strength reduction in the initial ARC peephole
analysis (ObjCARCOpts::OptimizeIndividualCalls).
2. Changes the ARC dataflow analysis (which runs after the peephole
analysis) to consider all objc_retainBlock calls to not be optimizable
(since if the call was optimizable, we would have strength reduced it
already).
This patch leaves in the infrastructure in the ARC dataflow analysis to
handle this case, which due to 2 will just be dead code. I am doing this
on purpose to separate the removal of the old code from the testing of
the new code.
<rdar://problem/13249661>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178284 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
