Summary:
The '?' flag uses the last section group if the last had a section
group. We treat combining an explicit section group and the '?' as a
hard error.
This fixes PR17198.
Reviewers: rafael, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1686
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For alignment purposes, the instruction array will always have an even
number of entries, with the final entry potentially unused (in which
case the array will be one longer than indicated by the count of unwind
codes field).
Reviewed by Anton Korobeynikov, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
data structures.
The Win64 EH data structures must be of type IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB
instead of IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32. This is easiely achieved by adding
the VK_COFF_IMGREL32 modifier to the symbol reference.
Change also references to start and end of the SEH range of a function
as offsets to start of the function.
Reviewed by Jim Grosbach, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190766 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we modelled VPR128 and VPR64 as essentially identical
register-classes containing V0-V31 (which had Q0-Q31 as "sub_alias"
sub-registers). This model is starting to cause significant problems
for code generation, particularly writing EXTRACT/INSERT_SUBREG
patterns for converting between the two.
The change here switches to classifying VPR64 & VPR128 as
RegisterOperands, which are essentially aliases for RegisterClasses
with different parsing and printing behaviour. This fits almost
exactly with their real status (VPR128 == FPR128 printed strangely,
VPR64 == FPR64 printed strangely).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190665 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add basic assembly/disassembly support for the first Intel SHA
instruction 'sha1rnds4'. Also includes feature flag, and test cases.
Support for the remaining instructions will follow in a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the new instruction deprecation feature to mark mftb (now replaced with
mfspr) and dst (along with the other Altivec cache control instructions) as
deprecated when targeting cores supporting at least ISA v2.03.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190605 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The 'Deprecated' class allows you to specify a SubtargetFeature that the
instruction is deprecated on.
The 'ComplexDeprecationPredicate' class allows you to define a custom
predicate that is called to check for deprecation.
For example:
ComplexDeprecationPredicate<"MCR">
would mean you would have to define the following function:
bool getMCRDeprecationInfo(MCInst &MI, MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
std::string &Info)
Which returns 'false' for not deprecated, and 'true' for deprecated
and store the warning message in 'Info'.
The MCTargetAsmParser constructor was chaned to take an extra argument of
the MCInstrInfo class, so out-of-tree targets will need to be changed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190598 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
expression uses an assembler temporary symbol from an assignment. In this case
the symbol does not have a fragment so the use of getFragment() would be NULL
and caused a crash. In the case of an assembler temporary symbol we want to use
the AliasedSymbol (if any) which will create a local relocation entry, but if
it is not an assembler temporary symbol then let it use that symbol with an
external relocation entry.
rdar://9356266
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These were pretty straightforward instructions, with some assembly support
required for HLT.
The ARM assembler is keen to split the instruction mnemonic into a
(non-existent) 'H' instruction with the LT condition code. An exception for
HLT is needed.
HLT follows the same rules as BKPT when in IT blocks, so the special BKPT
hadling code has been adapted to handle HLT also.
Regression tests added including diagnostic tests for out of range immediates
and illegal condition codes, as well as negative tests for pre-ARMv8.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190053 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
32-bit absolute addressing in instructions likei this:
mov $_f, %rsi
which is not supported in 64-bit mode.
rdar://8827134
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with a debug build) with this buggy .indirect_symbol directive usage:
% cat test.s
x: .indirect_symbol _y
The assertion is because it is trying to get the symbol index for the
symbol _y when it is writing out the indirect symbol table. This line of
code in MachObjectWriter::WriteObject() :
Write32(Asm.getSymbolData(*it->Symbol).getIndex());
And while there is a symbol _y it does not have any getSymbolData set which
is only done in MachObjectWriter::BindIndirectSymbols() for pointer sections
or stub sections. I added a check and an error in there to catch this in case
something slips through.
But to get a better error the parser should detect when a .indirect_symbol
directive is used and it is not in a pointer section or stub section. To make
that work I moved the handling of the indirect symbol out of the target
independent AsmParser code into the DarwinAsmParser code that can check
for the proper Mach-O section types.
rdar://14825505
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189497 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix a few things in one swoop.
# Add some negative tests.
# Fix some formatting issues.
# Add some missing IsThumb / ARMv8
# Fix some outs / ins mistakes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189490 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189469 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
first. Use this to turn the PPC modifiers into PPC specific expressions,
allowing them to work on constants.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code offset for unwind code SET_FPREG is wrong because it is set
to constant 0. The fix is to do the same as for the other unwind
codes: emit a label and later the absolute difference between the
label and the begin of the prologue.
Also enables the failing test case MC/COFF/seh.s
Reviewed by Jim Grosbach, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189309 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-Assembly parser now properly check the size of the memory operation specified in intel syntax. So 'mov word ptr [5], al' is no longer accepted.
-x86-32 disassembly of these instructions no longer sign extends the 32-bit address immediate based on size.
-Intel syntax printing prints the ptr size and places brackets around the address immediate.
Known remaining issues with these instructions:
-Segment override prefix is not supported. PR16962 and PR16961.
-Immediate size should be changed by address size prefix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189201 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
