The FPv4-SP floating-point unit is generally referred to as
single-precision only, but it does have double-precision registers and
load, store and GPR<->DPR move instructions which operate on them.
This patch enables the use of these registers, the main advantage of
which is that we now comply with the AAPCS-VFP calling convention.
This partially reverts r209650, which added some AAPCS-VFP support,
but did not handle return values or alignment of double arguments in
registers.
This patch also adds tests for Thumb2 code generation for
floating-point instructions and intrinsics, which previously only
existed for ARM.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's not meant to be used with operator delete and this avoids emitting virtual
dtors for every derived format object.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216170 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently only "add nsw" are widened. This patch eliminates tons of "sext" instructions for 64 bit code (and the corresponding target code) in cases like:
int N = 100;
float **A;
void foo(int x0, int x1)
{
float * A_cur = &A[0][0];
float * A_next = &A[1][0];
for(int x = x0; x < x1; ++x).
{
// Currently only [x+N] case is widened. Others 2 cases lead to sext.
// This patch fixes it, so all 3 cases do not need sext.
const float div = A_cur[x + N] + A_cur[x - N] + A_cur[x * N];
A_next[x] = div;
}
}
...
> clang++ test.cpp -march=core-avx2 -Ofast -fno-unroll-loops -fno-tree-vectorize -S -o -
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4695
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
advanced copy optimization.
This is the final step patch toward transforming:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
bx lr
Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
and is able to rewrite the following sequence:
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
into simple generic GPR copies that the coalescer managed to remove.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216144 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If we have a scalar reduction, we can increase the critical path length if the loop we're unrolling is inside another loop. Limit, by default to 2, so the critical path only gets increased by one reduction operation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds a new property: isInsertSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getInsertSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getInsertSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) INSERT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
advanced copy optimization.
This patch is a step toward transforming:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
bx lr
Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through
vmov r0, r1, d16
but it does not understand yet
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
Comming patches will fix that and update the related test case.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216136 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It makes no sense and can hide bugs. In particular, it lead
to left shift by 64 bits, which is an undefined behavior,
properly reported by UBSan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
target hook.
This patch teaches the compiler that:
rX, rY = VMOVRRD dZ
is the same as:
rX = EXTRACT_SUBREG dZ, ssub_0
rY = EXTRACT_SUBREG dZ, ssub_1
<rdar://problem/12702965>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216132 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds a new property: isExtractSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getExtractSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getExtractSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) EXTRACT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Store TargetSelectionDAGInfo as a pointer instead of a reference:
getSelectionDAGInfo() may not be implemented for certain backends
(e.g. it's not currently implemented for R600).
This bug is reported by UBSan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216129 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix for PR20648 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20648
This patch checks the operands of a vselect to see if all values are constants.
If yes, bail out of any further attempts to create a blend or shuffle because
SelectionDAGLegalize knows how to turn this kind of vselect into a single load.
This already happens for machines without SSE4.1, so the added checks just send
more targets down that path.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4934
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The goal of the patch is to implement section 3.2.3 of the AMD64 ABI
correctly. The controlling sentence is, "The size of each argument gets
rounded up to eightbytes. Therefore the stack will always be eightbyte
aligned." The equivalent sentence in the i386 ABI page 37 says, "At all
times, the stack pointer should point to a word-aligned area." For both
architectures, the stack pointer is not being rounded up to the nearest
eightbyte or word between the last normal argument and the first
variadic argument.
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Both MachineLoopInfo and MachineDominatorTree may be null in ScheduleDAGMI
constructor call. It is undefined behavior to take references to these values.
This bug is reported by UBSan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19530.
The problem is that X86ISelLowering erroneously thought the third call
was eligible for tail call elimination.
It would have been if it's return value was actually the one returned
by the calling function, but here that is not the case and
additional values are being returned.
Test Plan: Test case from the original bug report is included.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4968
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216117 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In PR20308 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20308 ), the critical-anti-dependency breaker
caused a miscompile because it broke a WAR hazard using a register that it thinks is available
based on info from a kill inst. Until PR18663 is solved, we shouldn't use any def/use info from
a kill because they are really just nops.
This patch adds guard checks for kills around calls to ScanInstruction() where the DefIndices
array is set. For good measure, add an assert in ScanInstruction() so we don't hit this bug again.
The test case is a reduced version of the code from the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4977
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the isRegSequence property.
This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the
isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM.
Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able
to optimize the following sequence:
vmov d0, r2, r3
vmov d1, r0, r1
vmov r0, s0
vmov r1, s2
udiv r0, r1, r0
vmov r1, s1
vmov r2, s3
udiv r1, r2, r1
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole
optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that
replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register
file), copy.
With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations:
1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy.
2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy.
The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the
operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction
and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s).
Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100.
The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the
TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we
switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register
(virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with
register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo.
Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the
rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1).
Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole
optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting.
This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I added wrapping to the CFGPrinter a while back so the -view-cfg
output is actually viewable. I've since enountered very long mangled
names with the same problem, so I'm slightly tweaking this code to
work in that case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216087 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes a bug I introduced in a previous commit (r216033). Sign-/Zero-
extension from i1 cannot be folded into the ADDS/SUBS instructions. Instead both
operands have to be sign-/zero-extended with separate instructions.
Related to <rdar://problem/17913111>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
legalization stage. With those two optimizations, fewer signed/zero extension
instructions can be inserted, and then we can expose more opportunities to
Machine CSE pass in back-end.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216066 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
